i'm wondering if it means that the reactionary wing is feeling a little concerned about their loss of credibility, between decisions like Dobbs and their ethics problems. Could they be pulling their horns in a little?
I'm amazed that Kavanaugh agreed with the liberals twice within a month (Idaho wetlands case in late May). But still, Thomas's dissent is so shockingly dishonest, arguing that districting must be race neutral, when the Alabama case was such a blantant effort to pack black voters into a single district that even 2 trump-appointed judges on the 11th district appeals court recognized it as such! I don't want to rain on the parade...I celebrate this victory, despite remaining generally terrified by this SCOTUS.
i'm wondering if it means that the reactionary wing is feeling a little concerned about their loss of credibility, between decisions like Dobbs and their ethics problems. Could they be pulling their horns in a little?
I'm amazed that Kavanaugh agreed with the liberals twice within a month (Idaho wetlands case in late May). But still, Thomas's dissent is so shockingly dishonest, arguing that districting must be race neutral, when the Alabama case was such a blantant effort to pack black voters into a single district that even 2 trump-appointed judges on the 11th district appeals court recognized it as such! I don't want to rain on the parade...I celebrate this victory, despite remaining generally terrified by this SCOTUS.
someone mentioned "offense" workers2024.com
Thank goodness!
Congratulation to a warrior of democracy.
Wooohooo!!!
I only wish the vote was not so close.